The messaging was never working. Somebody was covering for it.

TL;DR

A services business can go fifteen years without ever writing down what it does, and sell perfectly well the whole time, as long as the people doing the selling have done the work themselves. The story gets told correctly every time because it is being reassembled live, in the room, by somebody who knows which parts to leave out. When that stops being true, it arrives disguised as a marketing problem.

That is not a company with good messaging. It is a company with a subsidy.

The subsidy ends the day it hires a salesperson who has not done the work. Nothing about the market has changed and nothing about the offer has changed, but the story lands worse, the website suddenly looks confusing, and the whole thing gets diagnosed as a marketing problem that appeared out of nowhere. It did not appear. It was uncovered.

Read next: SPR, rebuilt around what the analysts actually knew · SLATT, positioned on the client's situation rather than the job title · The referral you can't repeat

The digression that was the meeting

In a meeting recently, somebody was asked what had worked in their marketing, and answered a different question instead.

He described two colleagues. Both had spent years actually doing the service before they ever sold it. When they sat across from a prospect there was never any confusion about what the company did, because they were not explaining a service. They were explaining a thing they had done, to somebody with the problem they had solved.

Then he described a newer colleague, hired to sell, who had not done the work. Same company, same market, same offer. Different sale.

He finished by calling it a small nuance and apologising for the digression. It was the most useful thing said in ninety minutes.

The translation was always happening. It just never produced a document.

A practitioner selling their own craft is doing something more complicated than being enthusiastic.

They are listening to a stranger describe a mess, matching it against the twenty versions of that mess they have personally cleaned up, and deciding in real time which two of the company's nine capabilities are relevant to this person and which seven would only confuse them.

That is positioning. It is being performed at conversational speed, once per meeting, and thrown away afterwards.

Because it never gets written down, it never gets noticed. The company's actual message exists, and it is good, and it lives in three or four people who do not know they are carrying it.

Which is why the website looks fine to everyone inside

Nobody who works there has ever needed the website to do this job.

They have always had a person in the room. So when the site lists every service the company offers, with equal weight and no ranking, it reads as accurate rather than as unusable. It is accurate. Accuracy was never the problem.

A buyer arriving cold has no practitioner. They have a page that tells them everything the company can do, which leaves them to work out on their own which two things apply to them and which seven do not. That is the work the practitioner was doing. Nobody has replaced it. It has simply been handed to the person least equipped to do it, at the moment they care least.

When it starts to look like a marketing problem

This is the point where the subsidy quietly ends and somebody gets blamed for it.

The new salesperson is not worse. They are working without the thing their colleagues never knew they had. Given a list of nine services and no ranking, they do the only available thing, which is present all nine and let the prospect choose. It reads as unfocused, because it is.

The company concludes that the message stopped working. What actually happened is that the message stopped being reconstructed by hand, for free, by somebody who had done the work.

The test takes ten minutes

Ask three people who sell the service to explain, separately and without warning, what the company does and who it is for.

Listen for where the answer comes from. The practitioners will reach for something they personally did. They will name a client situation, a mess they cleaned up, a decision that turned out to matter. Their version will be specific and slightly different each time, because each one is drawing on their own history.

The salesperson who has not done the work will reach for the website, because it is the only source available to them.

If the practitioners sound better than the page, the page is not the company's messaging. It is a list, and the messaging is somewhere else, unrecorded, and about to become a marketing problem.

The fix is not a script

The instinct at this point is to write a script, or a battlecard, or a one-pager that captures how the good sellers talk.

That captures the wrong layer. What made the practitioner effective was not their phrasing. It was the judgement underneath it, the constant unshowy decision about what to leave out for this particular person. Copy the phrasing and the new hire gets somebody else's words attached to none of the reasoning, which is worse than nothing, because it sounds rehearsed and cannot adapt.

The thing worth writing down is the decision. Which situations does this company genuinely solve for, which does it not, and what is the ranking when a prospect could plausibly be either. That is a positioning question and it has to be answered once, deliberately, by the people who have the pattern in their heads, before those people become unavailable or promoted or bored.

Do it while the practitioners are still selling

The reason to do this before it hurts is that the people who can answer it are exactly the people who will stop being in the room.

They get promoted into operations. They stop taking first meetings. They hire the sales team. Every one of those is a sign of success, and every one of them removes a little more of the subsidy that was making the marketing look like it worked.

A company that never had to explain itself has not been getting away with something. It has been well served by people who could do the explaining. That is worth writing down while they are still there to be asked.